
The 2009 ANZSSA Conference was held at the Gardens Point campus of the Queensland University of Technology (QUT), aptly described on their website as:
"Located on the Brisbane River in the city centre, next to the Botanic Gardens and Parliament House. It is within easy walking distance to shops, restaurants, theatres, galleries, and public transport including buses, trains and ferries." In other words, a beautiful setting for an urban institution of higher education. The QUT has a number of campuses, most notably in Kelvin Grove, a short shuttle bus ride from Brisbane’s city-centre.
Chris Hepperlin, Director of Student Support Services at the school, presented a good overview of some of the important issues and policies affecting students attending universities in Australia. In this entry, I will look at one—the Higher Education Support Amendment (Abolition of Compulsory Up-front Student Union Fees).

First, a quick primer of student activities in the United States--at schools in the U.S. undergraduates pay mandatory fees in addition to tuition and room and board (if in residence). These fees can cover a number of areas such as infrastructure, transit costs, and student activities. The student activities portion is then redirected to, possibly, a campus programming board, student government, and student media outlets (with or without input from advisors or student personnel administrators). Campus programming is augmented by a cadre of professional staff from such offices as Student Activities, Leadership, Programming Board, Club Sports, Service Learning, Family Weekend and Community Involvement. Whatever the configuration on a college or university campus, student activities is always a mix of student and staff time and resources.
In Australia student activities revolve around the student union and the sports association (or union). These bodies, composed entirely of current students, receive most, if not all, of the student union and sports association fees collected each year. They would then allocate the funds to the various groups, clubs, and services under their jurisdiction. All students would then be able to participate in student union sponsored activities. As in the U.S., the fees are a required part of a student’s overall bill. The unions are an entity unto themselves with almost no administrative oversight. Their governing body is elected in campus-wide elections. Members will serve on university policy-making boards and regularly consult with top administrators.

Most student unions also take on an advocacy role and student support services that would be almost unthinkable in the U.S. (a look at the student union at the University of Sydney will be in a future post). The Bond University Student Union declares students can get involved in
"clubs and societies, social and sporting events and external activities. We also provide academic and support services to Bond students who need advice or extra assistance in settling in to university life." Universities provide little, if any, monetary support for these student groups.
In December 2005 the fee structure changed dramatically. The Australian government banned mandatory university fees to student unions. There were many reasons for this action, with the primary one being a university
cannot require a student to be a member of a student association, union or guild. A 2006 Discussion Paper published by the Australian Government’s Department of Education, Science and Training, entitled,
Voluntary Student Unionism Transition Fund for Sporting and Recreational Facilities, states:
The Australian Government is opposed to compulsory union membership because it hinders freedom of association and forces students to pay for services they may not want. Students should not be forced to join a union, or be a member of an organisation that they do not wish to join, in order to further their education. They should have the right to choose the goods and services they want and the causes and organisations they are prepared to support.
The post-December 2005 system did allow for students to voluntarily join their student or sports unions, but the effect of the law has been a significant decrease in the actual number of students signing up. At every university I visited the impact of Voluntary student unionism (VSU) has produced between a dismal 10% - 15% participation rate which means up to a 90% drop in their income. The policy has forced these groups to cutback on their support of activities and relies on more direct assistance from a university’s central administration.

Recently, legislation has been introduced to turn back the 2005 Higher Education Support Amendment that abolished the compulsory up-front student union fees. It is too early to know whether there will be enough support for such a measure at the federal level.